Priority setting in times of crises: an analysis of priority setting for the COVID-19 response in the Western Pacific Region.

BACKGROUND: While priority setting is recognized as critical for promoting accountability and transparency in health system planning, its role in supporting rational, equitable and fair pandemic planning and responses is less well understood. This study aims to describe how priority setting was used to support planning in the initial stage of the pandemic response in a subset of countries in the Western Pacific Region (WPR). METHODS: We purposively sampled a subset of countries from WPR and undertook a critical document review of the initial national COVID-19 pandemic response plans. A pre-specified tool guided data extraction and the analysis examined the use of quality parameters of priority setting, and equity considerations. RESULTS: Nine plans were included in this analysis, from the following countries: Papua New Guinea, Tonga, The Philippines, Fiji, China, Australia, New Zealand, Japan, and Taiwan. Most commonly the plans described strong political will to respond swiftly, resource needs, stakeholder engagement, and defined the roles of institutions that guided COVID-19 response decision-making. The initial plans did not reflect strong evidence of public engagement or considerations of equity informing the early responses to the pandemic. CONCLUSION: This study advances an understanding of how priority setting and equity considerations were integrated to support the development of the initial COVID-19 responses in nine countries in WPR and contributes to the literature on health system planning during emergencies. This baseline assessment reveals evidence of the common priority setting parameters that were deployed in the initial responses, the prioritized resources and equity considerations and reinforces the importance of strengthening health system capacity for priority setting to support future pandemic preparedness.

Planning with a gender lens: A gender analysis of pandemic preparedness plans from eight countries in Africa.

Background: Health planning and priority setting with a gender lens can help to anticipate and mitigate vulnerabilities that women and girls may experience in health systems, which is especially relevant during health emergencies. This study examined how gender considerations were accounted for in COVID-19 pandemic response planning in a subset of countries in Africa. Methods: Multi-country document review of national pandemic response plans (published before July 2020 and as of March 2022) from Ethiopia, Ghana, Kenya, Nigeria, Rwanda, South Africa, Uganda, and Zambia, supplemented with secondary data on gender representation on planning committees. A gender analysis framework informed the study design and the Morgan et al. matrix guided data extraction and analysis. Results: All plans reflected implicit and explicit considerations of the impacts of the pandemic responses on women and girls. Through a gender lens, the implicit considerations focused on ensuring safety and protections (e.g., training, access to personal protective equipment) for community and facility-based health care workers and broad engagement of the community in risk communication. The explicit gender considerations, reflected in a minority of plans, focused on addressing gender-based violence and providing access to essential services (e.g., sexual and reproductive health care, psychosocial supports), products (e.g., menstrual hygiene products) and social protection measures. Women were underrepresented on the COVID-19 planning committees in all countries. Conclusions: The plans reflected varying national efforts to develop pandemic responses that anticipated and reflected unique vulnerabilities faced by women, though subsequent plans reflected further consideration of gender-relevant impacts compared to initial plans. Embedding a gender lens in emergency preparedness planning furthers equity and could support anticipation and timely mitigation of negative outcomes for women and girls who are often further marginalized during health emergencies.

Automated Vehicles for People With Dementia: A "Tremendous Potential" That "Has Ways to go"-Reports of a Qualitative Study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The prospect of automated vehicles (AVs) has generated excitement among the public and the research community about their potential to sustain the safe driving of people with dementia. However, no study to date has assessed the views of people with dementia on whether AVs may address their driving challenges. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This mixed-methods study included two phases, completed by nine people with dementia. Phase I included questionnaires and individual semistructured interviews on attitudes toward using different types of AVs (i.e., partially or fully automated). Interpretative phenomenological analysis was used to assess participants' underlying reasons for and against AV use. The participants' identified reasons against AV use informed the focus group discussions in Phase II, where participants were asked to reflect on potential means of overcoming their hesitancies regarding AV use. RESULTS: The results showed that people with dementia might place higher levels of trust in fully automated compared to partially automated AVs. In addition, while people with dementia expressed multiple incentives to use AVs (e.g., regaining personal freedom), they also had hesitations about AV use. These hesitancies were based on their perceptions about AVs (e.g., cost), their own abilities (i.e., potential challenges operating an AV), and driving conditions (i.e., risk of driving in adverse weather conditions). DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: The findings of this study can help promote the research community's appreciation and understanding of the significant potential of AVs for people with dementia while elucidating the potential barriers of AV use by people with dementia.

Can Automated Vehicles Be Useful to Persons Living With Dementia? The Perspectives of Care Partners of People Living With Dementia.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Driving cessation is a complex challenge with significant emotional and health implications for people with dementia, which also affects their family care partners. Automated vehicles (AVs) could potentially be used to delay driving cessation and its adverse consequences for people with dementia and their care partners. Yet, no study to date has investigated whether care partners consider AVs to be potentially useful for people with dementia. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: This mixed-methods study assessed the views of 20 former or current family care partners of people with dementia on AV use by people with dementia. Specifically, questionnaires and semistructured interviews were used to examine care partners' acceptance of AV use by people with dementia and their views about the potential usefulness of AVs for people with dementia. RESULTS: The results demonstrated that care partners identified possible benefits of AV use by people with dementia such as their anticipated higher social participation. However, care partners also voiced major concerns around AV use by people with dementia and reported significantly lower levels of trust in and perceived safety of AVs if used by the person with dementia in their care compared to themselves. Care partners' concerns about AV use by people with dementia included concerns around the driving of people with dementia that AVs are not designed to address; concerns that are specific to AVs but are not relevant to the nonautomated driving of people with dementia; and concerns that arise from existing challenges around the nonautomated driving of people with dementia but may be exacerbated by AV use. DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS: Findings from this study can inform future designs of AVs that are more accessible and useful for people with dementia.

Effectiveness of opiate substitution treatment in reducing HIV risk behaviors among African, Caribbean, and Black people: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this systematic review is to identify, appraise, and synthesize the best available evidence on the effectiveness of opioid substitution treatment in reducing HIV risk behavior among African, Caribbean, and Black people. INTRODUCTION: Substance use plays an important role in HIV transmission among Black people by increasing risky sexual behavior and the risk of HIV acquisition. Opioid substitution treatment, such as methadone maintenance treatment and buprenorphine therapy, has been found to be an effective measure to minimize HIV transmission attributable to opioid addiction. INCLUSION CRITERIA: The current review considered studies that included African, Caribbean, and Black adult patients, aged 18 years or over, who have used methadone maintenance treatment or buprenorphine therapies as part of the intervention for opioid use disorders and have been evaluated for sex- and drug-related HIV risk behaviors. This review considered studies that have evaluated the impact of methadone maintenance treatment or buprenorphine therapy on sex- and drug-related HIV risk behaviors. METHODS: Multiple databases were searched, including Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, OpenGrey, Grey Matters, New York Academy of Medicine Grey Literature Report, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Two reviewers independently assessed all titles and abstracts, and potentially relevant studies were retrieved in full. Papers selected for retrieval were assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity. Data were then extracted from papers. Statistical pooling of quantitative data and meta-analysis was not possible due to heterogeneity of data. RESULTS: Five articles were included in this review: three randomized controlled trials, one cohort study, and one quasi-experimental study. Four studies focused on methadone maintenance treatment and one study discussed the effectiveness of buprenorphine intervention. All studies were from the United States. One study enrolled participants in methadone maintenance treatment for heroin injectors, of which 10% of the sample was HIV positive. These papers included studies that reported a significant reduction in sex-related HIV risk behavior, including having multiple sex partners, frequency of sexual intercourse, condom use, prostitution, and sex trade. Of the five studies, two reported on drug-related HIV risk behaviors, citing a reduction in drug-related HIV risk behaviors. Also, these papers showed unexpected outcomes relating to frequency of sexual intercourse, prostitution, and sex trade. One study reported a significantly higher number of sexual encounters among persons not participating in treatment. One study reported decreasing prostitution and sex trade among individuals receiving methadone maintenance treatment intervention. CONCLUSION: Methadone maintenance treatment or buprenorphine therapy can be effective in reducing sex- and drug-related HIV risk behaviors among African, Caribbean, and Black people. However, due to the weaknesses in the body of evidence and the quality of evidence, it is not possible to make strong conclusions about these interventions. Rigorous studies are necessary to generate more findings and reinforce the body of literature. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO CRD42019126954.

Effectiveness of opiate substitution treatment in reducing HIV risk behaviors among African, Caribbean and black people: a systematic review protocol.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review aims to identify, appraise and synthesize the best available evidence on the effectiveness of methadone maintenance treatment or buprenorphine therapy in reducing sex- and drug-related HIV risk among African, Caribbean and black people. INTRODUCTION: Substance use plays an important role in HIV transmission and acquisition among African, Caribbean and black people by increasing risky sexual behavior and the risk of HIV acquisition. Pharmacological interventions targeting drug use, injection-related risk behaviors and HIV risk behaviors have been found to be effective measures in minimizing HIV transmission attributable to opioid addiction. INCLUSION CRITERIA: This review will consider studies that have evaluated the impact of methadone maintenance treatment or buprenorphine therapy on sex- and drug-related HIV risks. All interventions conducted in any clinical setting will be included. METHODS: Multiple sources of published and gray literature will be searched, including Embase, MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, OpenGrey, Grey Matters, New York Academy of Medicine's Grey Literature Report, ClinicalTrials.gov and WHO International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. All titles and abstracts identified will be reviewed independently by two reviewers and potentially relevant studies will be retrieved in full. Papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity. Data will be extracted from papers and will include details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: PROSPERO CRD42019126954.